Top scientists around the world, including experts from the FDA and the World Health Organization, on Monday pushed back against the need for large-scale corona virus vaccine booster shots.
In a ___ Review published in Scientists have argued that booster shots are not needed in the general population because vaccines are still highly effective in preventing serious illness and death. He also mentioned the urgent need to feed people around the world without immunizations to save lives and prevent the emergence of more dangerous species.
The review comes as the United States approaches the Biden administration’s controversy. Proposed start date For a booster rollout, eight months after the second shot of an individual’s Pfizer or Moderna Covid 19 vaccine was recommended. The report comes a week after the White House announced widespread pressure. Vaccination order Nearly two-thirds of the workforce is in the US, as are the pockets of unsafe people. Drive more Hospital admissions and deaths across the country
An external panel of FDA experts is holding a highly anticipated meeting. This friday Discuss Pfizer’s request for a booster dose.
The Lancet Review’s 18 co-authors include Marion Gruber, director of the FDA’s vaccine office, and Philip Cruz, the agency’s deputy director. He announced that he would resign in the fall.Allegedly opposed to the Biden administration’s booster plan. The review was also given by a number of World Health Organization experts, who made a global demand. Booster shot suspended To vaccinate more and more around the world – especially in developing countries where vaccination rates are high. Stay tuned.
The Lancet Paper reviews. Current evidence On the protection offered by existing vaccines. Although all vaccines provide less protection against delta variant infections than previously dominant alpha, they do provide excellent protection against severe disease. And while the ability to prevent infection or symptomatic disease may diminish over time, protection against severe disease appears to be still strong.
Three CDC reports published last week confirmed these findings in most age groups, with a significant decline in population. 75 or more. One of the studies was almost reviewed. 570,000 US COVID-19 cases. From April to July, people who were immunized were about 5 times more likely to become infected, and those who were vaccinated were 10 times more likely to be hospitalized or die. Are
The authors of the Lancet paper wrote, “Therefore, the current evidence does not indicate the need to increase the general population, which is more effective against severe disease.”
Data outside of Israel., Which has already begun rolling out booster shots, showed increased protection against infection and acute illness after the third shot of the Pfizer vaccine, which was originally given in two doses. But the Lancet authors note that the data was collected for only one week after the booster dose, and it is unclear how long this protection will last.
The Lancet authors argue that boosters may eventually be needed if the exemption expires over time, but further research is needed to determine when this will be necessary. For now, he argues, there is an urgent need to manage existing doses between immunizations. He also suggested that booster doses made specifically against different types of coronavirus circulation could be more powerful and longer lasting.
The authors wrote, “Even if some benefit can ultimately be gained by increasing, it will not exceed the benefits of providing initial protection to insecure people.” “If vaccines are deployed where they work best, they can accelerate the eradication of the epidemic by preventing further evolution of the variety.”
Mike Ryan, head of the WHO’s health emergency program, strongly condemned the booster shot rollout last month. “We plan to give extra life jackets to those who already have life jackets, while leaving other people to drown without a life jacket.” Ryan said.. “That’s the truth.”